Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef

[Sam Ravnborg]

> However, there are three main reasons why I pledge for sunifdef
> compatibility:
> 
> 1. There is a project page and an inviting community
> 2. There is HTML documentation
> 3. They use autotools, which is distributor and administrator-friendly

You do realize that unifdef is included in the kernel so
it just works?

> gcc -O2 -m64   -c -o unifdef.o unifdef.c
> unifdef.c: In function 'main':
> unifdef.c:129: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> function 'exit'
> unifdef.c:157: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> function 'exit'
> unifdef.c:180: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> function 'exit'
> gcc unifdef.o -o unifdef
Patches appreciated - seems a simple #include is missing.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/