Re: [PATCH take2 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker()

[Jeff Moyer]

==> Regarding [PATCH take2 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker(); Zach Brown <zach.brown@xxxxxxxxxx> adds:

zach.brown> Andrew, testing has now uncovered 2 bugs in this patch set that
zach.brown> have been fixed.  XFS and the generic file path were using
zach.brown> blkdev_direct_IO()'s return code to test if ops were in flight
zach.brown> and were missing EIOCBQUEUD.  They've been fixed.  I think this
zach.brown> can bake in -mm now.

zach.brown> Here's the initial introduction to the series with an update on
zach.brown> what's been tested:

zach.brown> There have been a lot of bugs recently due to the way
zach.brown> direct_io_worker() tries to decide how to finish direct IO
zach.brown> operations.  In the worst examples it has failed to call
zach.brown> aio_complete() at all (hang) or called it too many times
zach.brown> (oops).

zach.brown> This set of patches cleans up the completion phase with the
zach.brown> goal of removing the complexity that lead to these bugs.  We
zach.brown> end up with one path that calculates the result of the
zach.brown> operation after all off the bios have completed.  We decide
zach.brown> when to generate a result of the operation using that path
zach.brown> based on the final release of a refcount on the dio structure.

zach.brown> I tried to progress towards the final state in steps that were
zach.brown> relatively easy to understand.  Each step should compile but I
zach.brown> only tested the final result of having all the patches applied.

zach.brown> I've tested these on low end PC drives with aio-stress, the
zach.brown> direct IO tests I could manage to get running in LTP, orasim,
zach.brown> and some home-brew functional tests.

zach.brown> In http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/21/103 IBM reports success with
zach.brown> ext2 and ext3 running DIO LTP tests.  They found that XFS bug
zach.brown> which has since been addressed in the patch series.

We tested this on one of our smaller systems using ext3, and it holds up.
There was no performance degradation observed.  I would like to see some
raw testing;  I'll see if I can't get that done.

As with the last posting, I reviewed the direct I/O path with the patches
applied, and it's much nicer than before.

Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/