Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] OMAP1 PM Core, PM Core Implementation 2/2

[Scott E. Preece]

| From: Heikki Orsila<shd@xxxxxxxxxx>
| 
| On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:58:33PM -0500, Scott E. Preece wrote:
| > It also helps with static analysis tools.
| 
| I'd say those analysis tools are pretty useless if they can not handle 
| trivial cases like this.
| 
| > CodingStyle seems to
| > be silent on the point, but points to Kernighan and Ritchie, who say
| > "These initializations are actually unnecessary, since all are zero, but
| > it's a good idea to make them explicit anyway."
| 
| It was a local variable. They are not autoinitialised. Are you perhaps 
| mixing this with statics and globals?
---

Indeed - I answered too quickly.

However, as noted, there's no practical cost to including the
initializations and some of us do work in places where it's normallly
required.

scott
-- 
scott preece
motorola mobile devices, il67, 1800 s. oak st., champaign, il  61820  
e-mail:	preece@xxxxxxxxxxxx	fax:	+1-217-384-8550
phone:	+1-217-384-8589	cell: +1-217-433-6114	pager: 2174336114@xxxxxxxxx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/