Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inodediet patch

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:19:18 -0500
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> >> So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
> >> one above).
> >>
> > 
> > eh?  Eric's patch is based on -mm, which includes the XFS git tree.  If I
> > go and merge the inode-diet patches from -mm, XFS gets broken until you
> > guys merge the above mystery patch.  (I prefer to merge the -mm patches
> > after all the git trees have gone, but sometimes maintainers dawdle and I
> > get bored of waiting).
> > 
> > Is git://oss.sgi.com:8090/nathans/xfs-2.6 obsolete, or are you hiding stuff
> > from me?  ;)
> > 
> > 
> well it's in cvs:

That's nearly four months old!

> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.254&r2=text&tr2=1.253&f=h

<checks to see if the changelog is in Aramaic too>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/