Re: [2.6 patch] re-add -ffreestanding

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> it's correct, since with -ffreestanding gcc no longer has the right to 
> assume it had a full libc available.

BS, even without it gcc can't make such assumption.
There is not a single optimization, which would be invalid in a kernel 
environment and would be "fixed" by this option, so please stop this 
nonsense.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/