Re: [RFC][PATCH] fail kernel compilation in case of unresolved symbols

[Adrian Bunk]

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:31:59PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:47:25PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > At stage 2 modpost utility is used to check modules.
> > In case of unresolved symbols modpost only prints warning.
> > 
> > IMHO it is a good idea to fail compilation process in case of
> > unresolved symbols, since usually such errors are left unnoticed,
> > but kernel modules are broken.
> 
> The primary reason why we do not fail in this case is that building
> external modules often result in unresolved symbols at modpost time.
> 
> And there is many legitime uses of external modules that we shall support.

Is there a way we can get this only for building the kernel itself?
In this case an unresolved symbol is a real bug that should cause an 
abort of the compilation.

I'm often doing compile tests for the kernel, and the current warnings 
are too easy to miss.

> 	Sam

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/