Re: Re: [PATCH 00/22][RFC] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Mon Sep 04 2006 - 06:58:51 EST


On 9/3/06, Josef Sipek <jsipek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think you misunderstood my comment. What I meant to say was that there is
_no way_ you can compile a filesystem that has only dentry ops but not
superblock ops - this would happen if you tried to bisect and you landed
half way in the series of commits for the filesystem. For the _initial_
commit one cset makes sense. For subsequent fixes one commit per fix is the
only logical thing to do.

Reorder the patches so that Makefile and Kconfig changes come last and
git bisect will work just fine.

--
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/