Re: [patch 3/9] Guest page hinting: volatile page cache.

[Andy Whitcroft]

Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 07:57 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> +#define PG_state_change                21      /* HV page state is changing. */
>>> +#define PG_discarded           22      /* HV page has been discarded. */ 
>> We're already desperately short on page flags on 32-bit architectures.
>> It seems a wee bit silly to add two arch-generic flags for what is a
>> very specialized arch-specific feature at this point.
> 
> There are even three additional page flags if you apply the full set of
> patches.
> 
>> I know that there are 32-bit s390 kernels, but would this be a
>> reasonable feature to restrict to only 64-bit kernels?  That might be a
>> decent compromise.
> 
> Yes, it is definitly an option to make this a 64-bit only features. In
> particular because the ESSA instruction that is used on s390 is only
> available in zarch mode (=64 bit).

Wow.  Well there are only 7 extra bits available in 64 bit mode (the
FIELDS area is larger on 64bit machines).  Do we really, really need
three new bits.  What are they being used for here.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/