Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)

From: hui
Date: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 21:44:37 EST

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:22:03PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
> On 8/23/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 02:05:58PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> >> I'm on as "bh" if you want somebody that's interactive. It
> >> might help with things here.
> >
> >#kernelnewbies is the channel.
> Firewall where only port 80 is open. I tried this thing:
> but it looks like it connects to the wrong port (8888 vs 6667?), or
> something. I see that some Windows *shudder* client supposedly
> supports thru-firewill connections, and additionally some instructions
> about port-forwarding off an outside machine, but I'm kinda stuck for
> the moment.

This is IRC and the #kernelnewbies channel is where a number of us (folks
following Rik van Riel) lurk. Any client like BitchX should work if you
have those ports open from where you're coming from.

> Okay, tried the patch. I actually made it through one full kernel
> compile without going bang, but did crap out on the second iteration
> (after a 'make clean').
> I'll post the config, too, just so there's a clear understanding of
> where we are.

Ok, yeah, I've been trying to get a clean stack trace output and not
really focused on the core issue. The debug output stuff seemed to need
some attention because of the hanging and continuous output of stack
traces. It makes it difficult to figure out what's going on when there
are a cascade of failures going on.

I'll upload those small changes next and try to figure out what's going
on with kjournald and the rtmutex. This is going to be a pain.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at