Re: [PATCH 7/7] CPU controller V1 - (temporary) cpuset interface

From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Date: Tue Aug 22 2006 - 11:56:01 EST

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:01:01PM +0000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Yeah, a sleep/burn loop. The proggy is a one of several scheduler
> exploits posted to lkml over the years. The reason I wanted to test
> this patch set was to see how well it handles various nasty loads.

Ok ..thanks for pointing me to it. I am testing it now and will post my
observations soon.

That said, I think this patch needs more work, especially in the area
of better timeslice management and SMP load-balance. If you have any
comments on its general design and the direction in which this is
proceeding, I would love to hear them.

Thanks for your feedback so far on this!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at