Re: PCI MMCONFIG aperture size
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Aug 22 2006 - 10:58:32 EST
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 16:58, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > This says to me that (as long as the MCFG table has an End Bus Number of
> > > 31) a 32 MB decode area (32 MB aligned, too) is valid.
> > >
> > > Would something like the below patch be accepted? It makes my system
> > > work...
> > I already got a patch to remove the complete e820 validation code because
> > it broke far more than it fixed. That should fix your problem too.
> Great! Coming in 2.6.18?
> > > Also, why are we forcing 32 bit base addresses? ACPI defines it to be a
> > > 64 bit base...
> > Where do you think we do that?
> Looking at 2.6.17, we always have u32 base_address and u32
> base_reserved. base_address is the only one ever referenced, that I can
> see. I guess I should grab 2.6.18 pre-releases and recheck.
True. Please submit a patch.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/