Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Aug 22 2006 - 10:52:21 EST
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 16:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:50:57PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > this would need a "const after boot" section; which is really not hard
> > > to make and probably useful for a lot more things.... todo++
> > except for anything that needs tlb entries in user space. And it only gives you
> > false sense of security. --todo
> What's the alternative?
The alternative is to not protect it, since protecting it doesn't
offer any significant additional security over not protecting it.
> Change it from a struct to a compile time choice?
One of the design goals of paravirt-ops was to allow single binaries
that run on both native hardware and on hypervisors. So that would
be a non starter.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/