Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h

[Adrian Bunk]

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:56:03AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>relicensing them.
> >>    
> >
> >That's a pretty strong statement...
> >  
> 
> Well, I'm not making any kind of legal statement.  I'm just pointing out 
> that from a technical perspective, there's a large visible functional 
> change from before if we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) vs 
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ops).  Given that the whole point of paravirt_ops 
> is to minimize visible changes, this seems counterproductive.

It only affects kernels with the new functionality PARAVIRT=y, not 
kernels with the same functionality as today.

The alternative is to keep the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) and make 
the functions using it out of line functions.

>    J

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/