Re: [MODSLAB 3/7] A Kmalloc subsystem
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Sat Aug 19 2006 - 15:15:16 EST
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > And as we have just seen virt to page is mostly an address calculation in
> > many configurations. I doubt that there would be a great advantage. Todays
> > processors biggest cause for latencies are cacheline misses..
> It involves table walking on discontigmem archs. "slabp=addr &
> (~(PAGE_SIZE-1));" means no pointer chasing, and the access touches the same
> page, i.e. definitively no TLB miss.
There is no table walking for discontigmem on ia64. Ia64 only creates page
table if it needs to satify the Linux kernels demands for such a thing.
And this is a kernel mapping. No page table involved.
The current sparsemem approach also does not need table walking. It needs
to do lookups in a table.
UP and SMP currently work cleanly.
> > Power of 2 cache sizes make the object align neatly to cacheline boundaries
> > and make them fit tightly into a page.
> IMHO not really an issue. 2kb-cache_line_size() also aligns perfectly.
That would work and also be in line with the existing overhead of the
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/