Re: [PATCH 4/7] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven.
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Sat Aug 19 2006 - 05:05:28 EST
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:05:27 -0600
> "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> By not rolling our own inode we get a little more code reuse,
>> and things get a little simpler and we don't have special
>> cases to contend with later.
> On a standard FC5 install (which has selinux enabled) things get very ugly.
> udev: MAKEDEV: mkdir: file exists
> followed by a stream of udev errors of various sorts and then an infinite
> loop of auditd complaints about klogd and "/" and tmpfs. Nothing makes it
> to logs because klogd itself is failing.
I'm not feeling very generous today. I'm wondering what selinux bug
I have found now. Without selinux everything is fine on FC5.
Any chance of a search through that patchset to see which patch selinux
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/