Re: GPL Violation?
From: Helge Hafting
Date: Fri Aug 18 2006 - 05:04:55 EST
Ian Stirling wrote:
Which is why the maker of chip B would do very well to make a basic
The problem is that in many cases AIUI, a large entry barrier to
someone taking CPU A, chip B, sticking it in a box, and selling
it, is that there is no linux driver for chip B.
If you (as someone who does not make chip B) release the GPL'd
driver, then you're making it a fair bit easier for competitors,
who can now simply copy your often not very novel in any way
other than you thought of it first - design, and use that driver.
linux driver - perhaps not novel in any way, but now everybody want to
use B chips because it comes with working software.
And if linux powered gadgets with chip B becomes popular, surely
someone pick up the simple driver and improves it too.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/