Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] fix ext3 mounts at 16T

From: Andreas Dilger
Date: Fri Aug 18 2006 - 04:48:14 EST


On Aug 11, 2006 15:29 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 17:13 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > I figure before we get too fired up about 48 bits and ext4 let's fix 32 bits on ext3 :)
> >
> > I need to do some actual IO testing now, but this gets things mounting for a 16T ext3 filesystem.
> > (patched up e2fsprogs is needed too, I'll send that off the kernel list)
> >
> > This patch fixes these issues in the kernel:
> >
> > o sbi->s_groups_count overflows in ext3_fill_super()
> >
> > sbi->s_groups_count = (le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) -
> > le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) +
> > EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 1) /
> > EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb);
> >
> > at 16T, s_blocks_count is already maxed out; adding EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) overflows it and
> > groups_count comes out to 0. Not really what we want, and causes a failed mount.
> >
> > Feel free to check my math (actually, please do!), but changing it this way should work &
> > avoid the overflow:
> >
> > (A + B - 1)/B changed to: ((A - 1)/B) + 1
> >
> > o ext3_check_descriptors() overflows range checks

This is generally not safe because of underflow, but it also isn't possible
to have a 0-block filesystem so it should be OK.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/