Re: GPL Violation?
From: James Courtier-Dutton
Date: Thu Aug 17 2006 - 15:18:54 EST
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 22:48 -0700, Anonymous User wrote:
>> I work for a company that will be developing an embedded Linux based
>> consumer electronic device.
>> I believe that new kernel modules will be written to support I/O
>> peripherals and perhaps other things. I don't know the details right
>> now. What I am trying to do is get an idea of what requirements there
>> are to make the source code available under the GPL.
> you should talk to a lawyer, not LKML.
The easiest, no need to talk to a lawyer, most economical, way out of
this is to simply make all source code open and published under the GPL
or GPL compatible license with the appropriate "signed-off" entries.
As soon as you start trying to release some part of it as binary code,
then lawyers have to be involved and that tends to cost a lot more.
People on this list are NOT lawyers, so don't ask about that option on
>From the business perspective, it is likely to be far more profitable to
deliver an open source GPL licensed product to market, as you are then
likely to get a lot of free development effort work done for you by your
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/