Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API)
From: Dave Hansen
Date: Thu Aug 17 2006 - 10:30:21 EST
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:45 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> We need more complex decrement/locking scheme than krefs
> provide. e.g. in __put_beancounter() we need
> atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() semantics for performance optimizations.
Is it possible to put the locking in the destructor? It seems like that
should give similar behavior.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/