Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:39:43PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:

> +/*
> + *	The setbeanlimit syscall
> + */
> +asmlinkage long sys_setublimit(uid_t uid, unsigned long resource,
> +		unsigned long *limits)
> +{

[snip]

> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ub->ub_lock, flags);
> +	ub->ub_parms[resource].barrier = new_limits[0];
> +	ub->ub_parms[resource].limit = new_limits[1];

Would it be usefull to notify the "resource" controller about this
change in limits? For ex: in case of the CPU controller I wrote 
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/4/9), I was finding it usefull to recv
notification of changes to these limits, so that internal structures
(which are kept per-task-group) can be updated.


-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/