Re: [PATCH 1/2]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half
From: Linas Vepstas
Date: Wed Aug 16 2006 - 17:56:10 EST
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:46:40PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:34:31 -0400
> > Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > > I was under the impression that NAPI was for the receive side only.
> > That depends on the driver implementation.
> What Jeff is trying to say is that TX reclaim can occur in
> the NAPI poll routine, and in fact this is what the vast
> majority of NAPI drivers do.
I'll experiment with this. When doing, say, an ftp, there are
enough TCP ack packets coming back to have NAPI netdev->poll
be called frequently enough?
> implied. In fact, I get the impression that spidernet is limited
> in some way and that's where all the strange approaches are coming
> from :)
Hmm. Or maybe I'm just getting old. Once upon a time, low watermarks
were considered the "best" way of doing anything; never occurred to me
it would be considered "strange". Based on my probably obsolete idea
of what constitutes "slick hardware", I was actually impressed by what
the spidernet could do.
Aside from cleaning up the transmit ring in the receive poll loop,
what would be the not-so-strange way of doing things?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/