Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpucontroller

[Kirill Korotaev]

> > > Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect
> > > (atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)?
> >
> > we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container,
> > objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged
> > correctly on free.
>
>
> Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves
> from one container to another.
Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes
wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether
to change the file owner or not?

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/