Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpucontroller

[Kirill Korotaev]

> > The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever
> > gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code. 
> > I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of
> > this happening is low.
>
>
> I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource
> managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the
> OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although
> also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems.

Alan, I will be happy to hear what you mean by conservative :)
Maybe we can make it more revolutinary then.

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/