Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view"expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

[Avi Kivity]

Matthias Andree wrote:
> No, it is valid to run the test on commodity hardware, but if you (or
> the benchmark rather) is claiming "transactions", I tend to think
> "ACID", and I highly doubt any 200 GB SATA drive manages 3000
> synchronous writes per second without causing either serious
> fragmentation or background block moving.
You are assuming 1 transaction = 1 sync write.  That's not true.  
Databases and log filesystems can get much more out of a disk write.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/