Re: [PATCH] Fix a memory leak in the i386 setup code

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi,

Does x86_64 need a similar fix?

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 00:13, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  arch/i386/kernel/setup.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
> index 08c00d2..d32d264 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1327,7 +1327,10 @@ #endif
>  		res->start = e820.map[i].addr;
>  		res->end = res->start + e820.map[i].size - 1;
>  		res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> -		request_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
> +		if (request_resource(&iomem_resource, res)) {
> +			kfree(res);
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  		if (e820.map[i].type == E820_RAM) {
>  			/*
>  			 *  We don't know which RAM region contains kernel data,
> -

Evidently res is used if e820.map[i].type == E820_RAM, so it should
be freed later on, it seems.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/