Re: [patch 2.6.18-rc1] genirq: {en,dis}able_irq_wake() need refcounting too

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Jul 10 2006 - 05:16:23 EST



* Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > we should also add disable_irq_wake() / enable_irq_wake() APIs and
> > start migrating most ARM users over to the new APIs, agreed? That
> > makes the APIs more symmetric and the code more readable too.
>
> That _is_ the API anyway. set_irq_wake() was never intended to be
> called directly from drivers.

doh - right. So the patch is the right thing to do :-)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/