Re: SO_REUSEPORT and multicasting

[Jason]

--- James Courtier-Dutton <James@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> That address is a multicast address, and therefore
> needs to go in the 
> multicast routing table, and not the unicast one.
> You are using a command that only modifies the
> unicast table.
> 
> James

The broadcasts don't have to leave my PC so I
shouldn't need a multicast router, do I?  The client
is running in one terminal window and the server in a
second terminal window.

I checked the router man page and found the following:
route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 240.0.0.0 dev eth0
This is an obscure one documented so people know how
to do it. This sets all of the class D (multicast) IP
routes to go via "eth0".  This is the correct normal
configuration line with a multicasting kernel.

If there is another command, will you please tell me
what it is?

Thanks,

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/