RE: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

[David Schwartz]

> Chase Venters wrote:

> > can you name some non-GPL non-proprietary modules we should be concerned
> > about?

> You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary".  If so, then by
> definition there are none.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel

	Are you saying that there do not exist any non-proprietary licenses that
are incompatible with the GPL? That's obviously not true. Consider, for
example, a license that was basically the BSD license with an additional
prohibition against licensing with new restrictions. Consider the original
BSD license with advertising clause. Consider a license that requires the
source to always travel with the binary.

	DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/