Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives

[Pekka J Enberg]

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> This also means that by default we'd have no false positives at all, but 
> that there is a capable annotation method to reduce the amount of false 
> negatives, in a gradual and managable way - down to zero if everything 
> is annotated.

Yeah, sounds much better to me.  However, I am unable to figure out any 
real examples where we'd actually need the annotations for reasonably 
sane code.  Do you have some in mind?

					Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/