Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives

[Pekka J Enberg]

Hi Ingo,

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i dont know - i feel uneasy about the 'any pointer' method - it has a 
> high potential for false negatives, especially for structures that 
> contain strings (or other random data), etc.

Is that a problem in practice?  Structures that contain data are usually 
allocated from the slab.  There needs to be a link to that struct from the 
gc roots to get a false negative.  Or am I missing something here?

				Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/