Re: broken local_t on i386

[Christoph Lameter]

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Also on non preemptive kernels - which are the majority - it's a single
> instruction on x86. I guess preempt users can live with a bit more
> overhead ... 

I hope you will be fixing the cpu_local_* macros for i386 and x86_64 and 
add some appropriate docs? Are there any existing uses in the kernel?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/