Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)

[Russell King]

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:57:22PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday June 12, rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:32:39AM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > > SPF is application level version of this type of source sanity
> > > enforcement, and all that I intend to do is to publish that TXT
> > > entry for VGER.  Analyzing SPF data in incoming SMTP reception
> > > is a thing that I leave for latter phase  (how much latter,
> > > I can't say yet.)
> > 
> > In which case I have no option but to ask - Zwane, please stop using
> > my systems to forward your lkml email - Matti's proposed change will
> > potentially break that setup.
> 
> Of course you do have other options.

Since you haven't read my original reply to Matti, your comments aren't
appropriate for me since you don't know the full story.

However, I will point out that I'm at liberty to choose any option I
deem to be appropriate, for whatever reasons I feel appropriate.  In
this situation, I feel that withdrawing from providing mail forwarding
facilities is most appropriate.

I've been thinking about withdrawing that for some time for other
reasons - the SPF argument has provided another, and the final reason
to make it happen.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/