Re: [patch] undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-typeinstead

[David Miller]

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:03:56 +1000

> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > regarding your point wrt. path of integration - it is pretty much the 
> > only practical way to do this centrally as part of the lock validator 
> > patches, but to collect ACKs from subsystem maintainers in the process. 
> > So if you like it i'd like to have your ACK but this patch depends on 
> > the other lock validator patches (and only makes sense together with 
> > them), so they should temporarily stay in the lock validator queue. 
> > Hopefully this wont be a state that lasts too long and once the 
> > validator is upstream, all patches of course go via the subsystem 
> > submission rules.
> 
> Obviously as long as Dave is happy with it then it's fine.  However,
> it's probably a good idea to cc netdev for relevant patches so that
> they get a wider review.  If you've already sent this one there then
> I apologise for missing it :)

Yes, this is fine with me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/