Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Alex Tomas]

what if proposed patch is safer than an average fix?
(given that it's just out of usage unless enabled)

thanks, Alex

>>>>> Jeff Garzik (JG) writes:

 JG> Mike Snitzer wrote:
 >> On 6/9/06, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 >>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
 >>> > I disagree completely...  it would be an obvious win:  people who want
 >>> > stability get that, people who want new features get that too.
 >>> 
 >>> And developers have a better outlet for their wacky developmental 
 >>> urges...
 >> 
 >> And no real-world near-term progress is made for production users with
 >> modern requirements. What you're advocating breeds instability in the
 >> near-term.

 JG> Constantly patching the main, "stable" Linux filesystem breeds 
 JG> instability today.

 JG> 	Jeff





 JG> _______________________________________________
 JG> Ext2-devel mailing list
 JG> Ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 JG> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/