Re: [PATCH 2.6.16.18] MSI: Proposed fix for MSI/MSI-X load failure

[Paul Mackerras]

Rajesh Shah writes:

> The current MSI code actually does this deliberately, not by
> accident. It's got a lot of complex code to track devices and
> vectors and make sure an enable_msi -> disable -> enable sequence
> gives a driver the same vector. It also has policies about
> reserving vectors based on potential hotplug activity etc.
> Frankly, I've never understood the need for such policies, and
> am in the process of removing all of them.

Good.  We will not be able to support a policy of giving the driver
the same vector across an enable_msi/disable/enable sequence on IBM
System p machines (64-bit PowerPC), because the firmware controls the
MSI allocation, and it doesn't give us the necessary guarantees.

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/