Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()

[David Miller]

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:58:18 +0400

> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:51:24AM -0600, Brian F. G. Bidulock (bidulock@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >   Worse: he folded the jenkins algorith result with
> > 
> >    h ^= h >> 16;
> >    h ^= h >> 8;
> > 
> >   Destroying the coverage of the function.
> 
> It was done to simulate socket code which uses the same folding.
> Leaving 32bit space is just wrong, consider hash table size with that
> index.

You absolutely show not do this shifting on the jenkins hash
result, you destroy the distribution entirely.  Just mask
it with the hash mask and that's all you need to do.

Brian is right, this is absolutely critical to using the Jenkins hash
correctly.  You're "unmixing" the bits it worked so hard to mix.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/