Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()

From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
Date: Wed May 31 2006 - 03:59:29 EST


David,

On Wed, 31 May 2006, David Miller wrote:
>
> For sure and there are plans afoot to move over to
> dynamic table sizing and the Jenkins hash function.

Yes, that could be far more efficient.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/