Re: [PATCH] POSIX-hostname up to 255 characters
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw
Date: Fri May 26 2006 - 14:00:41 EST
On Fri, 2006-05-26 10:28:13 -0700, Randy.Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2006, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
[Patch touchin all archs]
> > ...and this should have gone to linux-arch, too...
>
> so how does someone know:
> (a) that this should have gone to linux-arch
Anything that modifies all architectures (eg. new system calls,
low-level MM changes, ...) should go to linux-arch. This is where all
architecture maintainers are expected to be around.
> (b) that linux-arch exists
Noticing the existance of linux-arch is admittedly a hard job. It's a
quite specialized low-volume list, so most people actually never ever
recognize it--unfortunately.
> (c) what it's full email address it?
The list's email address is linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I.e., where is all of this explained?
Nowhere :-/
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
fÃr einen Freien Staat voll Freier BÃrger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature