Re: [patch 2/3] vdso: improve print_fatal_signals support by addingmemory maps

[Zachary Amsden]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
>  
>  static void print_fatal_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
>  {
> @@ -781,9 +870,13 @@ static void print_fatal_signal(struct pt
>  			printk("%02x ", insn);
>  		}
>  	}
> -#endif
>  	printk("\n");
> +	if (current->mm)
> +		printk("vDSO at %p\n", current->mm->context.vdso);
> +#endif
>  	show_regs(regs);
> +	printk("\n");
> +	print_vmas();
>  }
>  
>  static int __init setup_print_fatal_signals(char *str

Perhaps I should have read your first patch more carefully - it did have 
register info.  This looks even better (although you may now want to 
allow it to be #ifdef'd out under CONFIG_EMBEDDED).

You probably should use PATH_MAX+1 instead of SIZE or check IS_ERR() on 
the string from d_path.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/