Re: Ingo's realtime_preempt patch causes kernel oops

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 18:27 +0200, Yann.LEPROVOST@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I forgot to say that I let SA_SHIRQ as the IRQ line is shared...
> It seems to work correctly...

What shares it?

Reason I ask, is that this irq is now running in true interrupt context,
and that on PREEMPT_RT the spin_locks are mutexes and can schedule. So
if another device is sharing this irq, then its interrupt handler will
be running in interrupt context, and if it grabs a spin_lock than is not
a raw_spinlock_t then you will have a crash.

This won't be a problem if you only turn on Hard irqs as threads and
don't do the PREEMPT_RT.

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/