Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained?

[Måns Rullgård]

John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> Be serious, oprofile is good working code, even if you have some
>> personal problem with it.
>
> Does the opinion of the former mantainer count for nothing? If nothing
> else, it should remain experimental on arches like Alpha, where there's
> a whole bunch of events that can't possibly work.

Why should be marked experimental only because of architecture limits?
If the parts that can work, work well, there's no reason to suggest
otherwise.  (Speaking as an Alpha owner)

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/