Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction

[Eric W. Biederman]

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx):

> Yup.
>
> Adding 7 extra void*'s seems to affect only dbench, which
> whose degration with the nsproxy falls outside the noise.
> The odd thing isn't so much the degradation, but the widely
> scattered values, compared to without nsproxy.

Well dbench is filesystem heavy so it may have some need to 
actually be using the filesystem namespace.  Although I can't
think of why it would.  Do you wan to track down that performance
regression or do you want to give up on that space optimization for
now?

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/