Re: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64

[Chris Wedgwood]

On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:35:12AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> It's not a glibc problem really.  The problem is this stupid error
> message in the kernel.

It must have been added very recently surely?  Has this syscall
implemented and the FC kernel doesn't seem that old.

Did FC update glibc "ahead of it's kernel" in a sense?

> We rely in many dozens of places on the kernel returning ENOSYS in
> case a syscall is not implemented and we deal with it appropriately.

Is there a list or document anywhere which details what glibc's
requirements are when it comes to unimplemented syscalls and fallback
behavior?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/