Re: AMD 8131 MSI quirk called too late, bus_flags not inherited ?

From: Brice Goglin
Date: Sun May 21 2006 - 09:24:43 EST


Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> @@ -925,8 +926,9 @@
>> if (dev->no_msi)
>> return status;
>>
>> - if (dev->bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + for (bus = dev->bus; bus; bus = bus->parent)
>> + if (bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> temp = dev->irq;
>>
>
> It seems we must add this loop to pci_enable_msix as well.
>

Right, thanks. Greg, what do you think of putting the attached patch in
2.6.17 ?

By the way, do we need to check dev->no_msi in pci_enable_msix() too ?

For 2.6.18, I don't know what's the best. We could drop the fact that
bus flags should be inherited and keep looking at parent busses. It
might be good to add a pci_check_flag_in_parent_busses(dev, flag) to
provide a generic way to do my for loop.

thanks,
Brice


Signed-off-by: Brice Goglin <brice@xxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-mm/drivers/pci/msi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-mm.orig/drivers/pci/msi.c 2006-05-21 15:12:04.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-mm/drivers/pci/msi.c 2006-05-21 15:15:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -916,6 +916,7 @@
**/
int pci_enable_msi(struct pci_dev* dev)
{
+ struct pci_bus *bus;
int pos, temp, status = -EINVAL;
u16 control;

@@ -925,8 +926,9 @@
if (dev->no_msi)
return status;

- if (dev->bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
- return -EINVAL;
+ for (bus = dev->bus; bus; bus = bus->parent)
+ if (bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
+ return -EINVAL;

temp = dev->irq;

@@ -1162,6 +1164,7 @@
**/
int pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev* dev, struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec)
{
+ struct pci_bus *bus;
int status, pos, nr_entries, free_vectors;
int i, j, temp;
u16 control;
@@ -1170,6 +1173,10 @@
if (!pci_msi_enable || !dev || !entries)
return -EINVAL;

+ for (bus = dev->bus; bus; bus = bus->parent)
+ if (bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
status = msi_init();
if (status < 0)
return status;