Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables

[Paul Mackerras]

David S. Miller writes:

> If you have to hide the operation so deeply like this, maybe you can
> do something similar to sparc64, by explicitly doing the per-cpu fixed
> register and offsets, and still get the single instruction relocs that
> powerpc can do for up to 64K by doing something like:
> 
> 	&per_cpu_blah - &per_cpu_base
> 
> to calculate the offset.

I don't know how to tell gcc that (&per_cpu_blah - &per_cpu_base) is a
quantity that the linker can compute and that will fit into a 16-bit
offset.  If I use an inline asm, then I have to generate the address
and let gcc dereference it, because __get_cpu_var is used both as an
lvalue and an rvalue.  That means two instructions where one would
suffice.  So there doesn't seem to be a way to get the optimal code,
unless the gcc folks are willing to add a -fkernel or something for
us. :)

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/