Re: [git patch] fuse fixes

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thu Apr 27 2006 - 10:40:08 EST


> >> This function is called from everywhere, and so, it looks like it should
> >> use SLAB_NOFS rather than SLAB_KERNEL. I would audit every GFP_KERNEL
> >> and SLAB_KERNEL usage, and consider replacing with SLAB_NOFS or GFP_NOFS.
> >
> > GFP_NOFS doesn't make much sense, since mm never calls back into FUSE
> > anyway: FUSE writes through the page-cache, and hence never dirties
> > any pages.
> >
> > I'll add a comment to fuse_request_alloc().
>
> If you're using loop, particularly something insane like swapping over
> loop, "the path" will certainly want to know that its passing through
> the VFS layer, regardless of specific page cache behavior, AFAICS.

IIRC "loop" decouples the base filesystem from any user of the loop
device by a kernel thread and mediating buffers.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/