Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev

[Rolf Eike Beer]

Am Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 00:00 schrieb Kristen Accardi:
>On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 08:16 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 15:50 -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
>> > Don't call pci_enable_device from pciehp because the pcie port service
>> > driver already does this.
>>
>> hmmmm shouldn't pci_enable_device on a previously enabled device just
>> succeed? Sounds more than logical to me to make it that way at least...
>
>I can't think of any reason why not.  Something like this what you had
>in mind perhaps?
>
>---
> drivers/pci/pci.c |   14 +++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>--- 2.6-git-pcie.orig/drivers/pci/pci.c
>+++ 2.6-git-pcie/drivers/pci/pci.c
>@@ -504,11 +504,15 @@ pci_enable_device_bars(struct pci_dev *d
> int
> pci_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
>-	int err = pci_enable_device_bars(dev, (1 << PCI_NUM_RESOURCES) - 1);
>-	if (err)
>-		return err;
>-	pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_enable, dev);
>-	dev->is_enabled = 1;
>+	int err;
>+
>+	if (!dev->is_enabled) {
>+		err = pci_enable_device_bars(dev, (1 << PCI_NUM_RESOURCES) - 1);
>+		if (err)
>+			return err;
>+		pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_enable, dev);
>+		dev->is_enabled = 1;
>+	}
> 	return 0;
> }

What about

if (dev->is_enabled)
	return 0;

and leaving the rest as it is? This would save one level of identation. 
Opinions?

Eike

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature