Re: Fw: Possible MTD bug in 2.6.15

From: Jim Ramsay
Date: Sat Apr 22 2006 - 12:50:05 EST


> From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On 4/19/06, Thiago Galesi <thiagogalesi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ok, a couple of comments/questions
> >
> > 1 - Wouldn't it be better to map all flash, and leave the unneeded
> > part as read only?

In general, yes. But this should either be enforced somewhere nicer
(ie, die gracefully) so the kernel doesn't panic later, or be allowed
as in my patch.

> > 2 - Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches format for sending
> > patches (especially the signed-off part and sending patches inline)
> >
> > 3 - No C++ style comments, please
>
> 4 - Read Documentation/CodingStyle before resubmitting the patch.

My apologies, I will do so, and resubmit when the patch is ready :)

--
Jim Ramsay
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/