RE: kfree(NULL)

[Daniel Walker]

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:53 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> > struct likeliness {
> > 	char *file;
> > 	int line;
> > 	atomic_t true_count;
> > 	atomic_t false_count;
> > 	struct likeliness *next;
> > };
> 
> It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit tricky (might have interdependency).
> 
> Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't really care about losing a count occasionally..

It's nice so you don't have to fool around with locking .. The atomic_t
structure is pretty simple thought . I think it boils down to just an
int anyway .

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/