Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:30:26PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/
> >> >
> >> >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the
> >> >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I
> >> >missing something here?
> >> 
> >> (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?)
> >
> >No idea, try submitting the patch :)
> >
> Because it's too big, you only get URLs:
> 
> [01/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_hooks-2.6.17-rc2.diff  137KB
> [02/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_module-2.6.17-rc2.diff  27KB
> 
> Don't mention CodingStyle, I know. This is just a post to respond to the
> topic on why noone submitted it earlier.
> I already see it coming...

I don't understand.  Do you really want to get this module into the
kernel?  Or are you just posting it here for the link when people
stumble across it in the archives?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/